Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Biosimilars in oncology
  1. Josep Tabernero
  1. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Josep Tabernero; jtabernero{at}vhio.net
  • podcast

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Biosimilars will soon become broadly available in the oncology field, raising important questions from both patients and healthcare providers. These questions need to be clarified upfront, in order to increase confidence in using these therapies.

In this podcast, Teresa Amaral (Young Oncologist Committee member) talks to JTosep Tabernero (ESMO President and Director of the Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology) in Barcelona about this timely topic—biosimilars in oncology.

‘Biosimilars are biological products that contain a similar version of the active substance of their originator or reference product (biologic), derived from living organisms.1 Minimal differences between biosimilars and their original might exist, but the original compounds themselves can differ slightly in their composition (different oligo- or polysaccharides, for example), depending on the time they were produced. However, the difference between the original compound and the biosimilar is never related to the mechanism of action, since the potential variable polysaccharides are never incorporated in the Fab or distal Fc region of the antibody.

The clinical and preclinical investigation programs for biosimilars are very well established, both by EMA (European Medicines Agency) and FDA (Food and Drug Administration), and include pharmaceutical quality studies, comparative analytical functional studies, comparative non-clinical tests and clinical studies. Moreover, a very comprehensive pharmacovigilance plan is also implemented.

In terms of safety, the potential differences observed between biosimilars and their original are most likely related to immunogenicity. Yet, these small differences can also be perceived with original compounds, as mentioned previously, and here comes into play the central role of the pharmacovigilance plan.

The use of biosimilars can be extrapolated from one clinical indication to another (extrapolation), and a switching process (from original to biosimilar, biosimilar to original and one biosimilar to another biosimilar) can also occur. The ESMO position paper1 emphasizes that physicians are responsible for the prescription and therefore patients must be clearly and thoroughly informed about the switching process, before it takes place. Automatic substitution/switching should be avoided.

A strong collaboration between the different stakeholders in the biosimilars investigation field exists, and should be maintained, since this represents a possibility of easier access to biological drugs in an era where the health systems’ sustainability is an everyday issue.’

You can hear more about it in the following link: (link to the audio recording)

Reference

  1. 1.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.