Statistics from Altmetric.com
We have read with interest the recommendations regarding the treatment of patients with lung cancer during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.1
In Spain, we are suffering a similar situation and facing a lack of evidence on how to manage patients with lung cancer when considering the risk/benefit ratio of continuing treatment or temporarily stop it. We understand the need of some guidelines, but we do not understand the affirmation ‘prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with systemic anticancer treatment should be considered’, 1 appearing in different parts of the manuscript and that seems to suggest that during the infection these factors should be used more frequently than what it is recommended in guidelines2 and therefore have a protective role. We do not agree with this suggestion, since the severity of this infection seems to be more correlated with a cytokine release picture than with a conventional sepsis or infection and that the haemophagocytic syndrome that critically ill infected patients present is characterised by the increase in various interleukins, and even the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, among others, and that cytopaenias are more explained by immune phenomenon3 than as a consequence of treatments.
We think that this recommendation might be more prejudicial than beneficial, since we do not have enough evidence to support it. The patients we have treated in Spain showed that severity is more associated to an hyperinflammatory syndrome than with a standard sepsis situation, in a context of neutropaenic infection and therefore granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for SARS-CoV-2 may not be useful and even harmful if we treat lung cancer patients with G-CSF.
We would like to finish emphasising the need of strong evidence (or at least some evidence) to guide experts’ opinion keeping always in mind primum non nocere.
Contributors The authors have contributed equally.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.