Article Text

Download PDFPDF

New emerging targets in cancer immunotherapy beyond CTLA-4, PD-1 and PD-L1: Introducing an “ESMO Open – Cancer Horizons” Series
  1. Matteo Lambertini1,2,
  2. Matthias Preusser3,
  3. Christoph C Zielinski M.D.4
  1. 1Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  3. 3Clinical Divison of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, General Hospital – Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  4. 4Vienna Cancer Center, City of Vienna - Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matteo Lambertini; matteo.lambertini{at}unige.it

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The ability of tumour cells to escape the surveillance and elimination by the immune system represents one of the hallmarks of cancer.1 2 This concept of immune control against cancer development, recognised more than 60 years ago by Paul Ehrlich, has recently led to the development of novel different treatment approaches (ie, cancer immunotherapy) aiming to reinvigorate the capability of the immune system to recognise and eliminate tumour cells.3 For this purpose, while the use of tumour antigenic material as a cancer vaccine has not proven to be particularly successful so far,4 the advent of therapies able to inactivate inhibitory immune receptors (ie, immune checkpoints) leading to a subsequent increased anti-tumour response has radically changed the natural history of many malignancies including of several aggressive and orphan diseases.

The immunotherapy tsunami has started with the advent of ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody blocking the immune checkpoint cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.5 The subsequent introduction of other antibodies blocking the immune checkpoints programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), including pembrolizumab, nivolumab, durvalumab and atezolizumab, has further generated a major impact on the prognosis of patients with many solid tumours and haematological malignancies.6 More recently, combination strategies with direct (ie, reducing tumour burden) or indirect (ie, increasing tumour immunogenicity) anti-tumour effects have shown to be possible approaches to improve at a greater extent the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.3 Specifically, concurrent administration of chemotherapy with the available checkpoint inhibitors7–11 as well as combined CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade12–14 have already proved to be highly effective in phase III clinical trials.

Nevertheless, despite the significant success of these approaches, not all treated patients derive benefit from the use of the currently available immunotherapy-based treatments, and in those with initial tumour response, disease progression can occur.15 Indeed, primary tumour refractoriness as well as acquired tumour resistance to the available immune checkpoint inhibitors is one of the major challenges to overcome in the field of cancer immunotherapy.16 In addition, these treatments can lead to the development of several adverse events that can involve all organs and, in some cases, may be very serious and even lethal.17 Recently, many new inhibitory or stimulatory molecules have been identified as potential targets to overcome these issues for further improving the ability of the immune system to eradicate cancer cells.18 19 With a series of mini-reviews on this topic, ‘ESMO OpenCancer Horizons’ aims at providing an update of the most interesting and upcoming targets in cancer immunotherapy highlighting their biological mechanism, the existing targeted agents under investigation and their current stage of clinical development.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed in writing this editorial.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests ML served as a consultant for Teva and received honoraria from Theramex outside the submitted work.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.