Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Cancer care during the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy: young oncologists’ perspective
  1. Matteo Lambertini1,2,
  2. Angela Toss3,
  3. Antonio Passaro4,
  4. Carmen Criscitiello5,
  5. Chiara Cremolini6,
  6. Claudia Cardone7,8,
  7. Fotios Loupakis9,
  8. Giuseppe Viscardi8,10,
  9. Icro Meattini11,12,
  10. Maria Vittoria Dieci13,14,
  11. Roberto Ferrara10,
  12. Raffaele Giusti15,
  13. Massimo Di Maio16,17
  1. 1 Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
  2. 2 Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
  3. 3 Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
  4. 4 Division of Thoracic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  5. 5 New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
  6. 6 Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
  7. 7 Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale' - IRCCS, Naples, Italy
  8. 8 Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
  9. 9 Department of Oncology, Unit of Oncology 1, Oncologic Institute of Veneto IRCCS, Italy
  10. 10 Department of Medical Oncology, Thoracic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
  11. 11 Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'M. Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  12. 12 Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
  13. 13 Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
  14. 14 Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  15. 15 Medical Oncology Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital of Rome, Rome, Italy
  16. 16 Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  17. 17 Medical Oncology, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matteo Lambertini; matteo.lambertini{at}
  • editorial

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

View Full Text

Statistics from

At the end of 2019, a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (CoV), named SARS-CoV-2 or 2019-nCoV, has been identified as the microbial agent causing viral pneumonia in several patients epidemiologically linked to a seafood market in Wuhan (Hubei province, China).1 2 Since then, the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has progressively involved countries outside China leading the World Health Organization (WHO) to make the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterised as a pandemic.3

Outside China, Italy has the largest COVID-19 outbreak with 37 860 confirmed cases and 4032 deaths according to the data of ‘Istituto Superiore di Sanità’ on 20 March 2020.4 In order to limit viral spread, the Italian Government has implemented extraordinary measures which culminated on 9 March in a lockdown inhibiting—unless strictly required—people’s movements and social activities throughout the national territory.5

The Italian National Health System is currently under pressure and remarkable efforts are spent to provide an efficacious reaction to the emergency. As Italy is experiencing a chronic shortage of healthcare workers, the government announced a plan to recruit 20 000 new doctors, nurses and hospital employees, to meet public demand, on 9 March.6 Retired doctors may be called on as well as residents who have completed their medical degree and are in the final year of specialist training. Meanwhile, doctors who have come into contact with patients affected by COVID-19 are encouraged to work unless they show symptoms of the infection or have a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. However, allowing untested healthcare personnel to take care of patients may be a double-edged sword due to the fact that undocumented infections may be the primary source of documented cases.7 Moreover, shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) appear to be widespread across the health service and include general practitioner practices as well as hospitals.

Specific algorithms and protocols within the Emergency Medical System are being implemented, including the attempt to increase intensive care unit (ICU) capacity.8 9 For this purpose, especially in most affected areas, medical specialists including oncologists have been recruited to provide their assistance in managing patients suffering from COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation in ICUs, departments of infectious or respiratory diseases, or general internal medicine.

Older adults and patients with pre-existing comorbidities (commonly diabetes and cardiovascular disease) are facing the most severe and critical consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak.10 11 Age is also a risk factor for cancer development,12 and patients with cancer are more susceptible to infections as compared to healthy subjects due to systemic immunosuppression secondary to both the malignancy and anticancer treatments.13 Hence, the current emergency is of particular concern to medical oncologists and their patients. In the first article focusing on oncological cases affected by COVID-19, Liang and colleagues concluded that the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher in patients with cancer who deteriorated more rapidly in the clinic and had a higher risk of severe events including the necessity for admission to the ICU or death.14 Older age remained the only risk factor associated with severe events from SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with cancer. The authors suggested three measures for reducing the burden of COVID-19 in oncology in endemic areas: to postpone treatments or elective surgery for stable cancer in endemic areas, to provide stronger personal protection provisions to patients and, finally, to offer more intensive surveillance or treatment for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.14 In this situation of emergency for healthcare systems, the inability to receive needed medical services is an additional concern.15

The issue on how to organise cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic is crucial.16 In order to provide some guidance on cancer care during the Italian SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) in partnership with the boards of Academic Oncologists (COMU) and of Oncology Unit Directors (CIPOMO) has recently proposed some critical recommendations for patients currently receiving active treatments, those in follow-up (ie, out of active treatment), as well as for the admission of patients and their caregivers to the hospital.17

For patients currently receiving active treatments, oncologists are invited to consider, on a case-by-case basis, the possibility of a delay in treatment administration. The decision of confirming the scheduled administration or delaying treatment should be based on the biological features of the tumour, the clinical condition of the patient with his/her symptoms, treatment characteristics (ie, expected benefit and adverse events including myelosuppression), disease response to current anticancer therapy, and the potential risks for an infection with SARS-CoV-2. An alert about the use of checkpoint inhibitors is raised by the identification of the cytokine storm-induced hyperinflammation as a pathogenetic mechanism for COVID-19-associated pneumonia of severe clinical scenarios.18 However, it should be recognised that an evidence-based estimation of the impact of treatment delay or interruption on the risk/benefit balance for each individual patient is currently lacking.

For patients who are currently in follow-up (ie, out of active treatment), oncologists should consider to avoid disease-free patients coming to the hospital for routine follow-up visits. A phone call/online exchange of clinical documentation can be useful to reassure patients, and refrain from consultation at the hospital except for the case of an emergence of new symptoms or new clinical or radiological signs of disease progression.

Regarding admission to the hospital, outpatients scheduled for treatment should come alone and avoid the assistance by a caregiver except for documented need of continuous assistance. Triage of patients with fever and/or respiratory symptoms is essential to prevent exposure to other patients and healthcare providers.17

As young oncologists working in different regions, we are all implementing these recommendations (table 1). The overall goal of all these recommendations is the attempt to maintain cancer care in the frame of an environment as safe as possible for both patients and healthcare providers. Notwithstanding some adaptations based on the specific directives of single institutions, the high level of homogeneity on how these measures are being implemented across centres is reassuring for the Italian oncology community and patients with cancer.

Table 1

Practical suggestions on how to implement cancer care during the COVID-19 outbreak

However, some opinions diverging from the described strategies have been voiced: for example, some colleagues have raised concerns regarding the delay of treatment for advanced disease or cancer screenings of healthy individuals.19 We believe that in the context of the current emergency situation and considering the severely increased strain on our National Health System, the delay of the mentioned procedures is reasonable and realistically unavoidable. We are not advocating distraction, but we are clearly pointing to the necessity to save the life of thousands of people. As we are facing a rapidly evolving and unprecedented emergency, we are all forced to constantly reconsider and critically re-evaluate our opinions.

Special additional challenges for oncologists include the differential diagnosis between SARS-CoV-2 infection and clinical and radiological findings related to drug-mediated toxicity (eg, immunotherapy), other infectious agents or cancer progression requiring specialised expertise of medical oncologists. Moreover, the management of patients with cancer also affected by COVID-19 represents a further need which should guarantee both active and potentially life-saving anticancer treatments as well as palliative and end-of life care.

In addition to the above recommendations, face-to-face interactions should be consistently restricted in this emergency period (table 1). As young oncologists living in the era of technology and social media, this difficult moment may serve as the basis to implement telemedicine whenever possible and feasible.20 Massive efforts should be put into monitoring of patients at home with regular contacts by telephone, electronic text transmission, email or smartphone apps. In these particular situations, such strategies could also help to alleviate patient isolation and loneliness by psychological interventions. Although ‘telehealth’ cannot be the only future strategy of medicine considering the relevance of patient-doctor interactions which are of special relevance in the field of oncology, the current crisis of the healthcare system necessitates the use of electronic communication as a valid tool to further optimise cancer care (eg, management of follow-up visits, oral therapies, etc) in such difficult circumstances.

As a final important note, the COVID-19 crisis is also hindering cancer research. Special considerations related to this regard should be highlighted and faced also considering the particular heterogeneity of available resources in the different units across the country (Box 1). The Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Italian Medicines Agency have issued special guidance for the conduction of clinical trials during the COVID-19 emergency.21–23

Box 1

Main challenges for cancer research during the COVID-19 outbreak

  • Minimise or delay the opening of new clinical trials.

  • Limit or hold patients’ accrual in ongoing trials requiring extra procedures as compared with clinical practice.*

  • Need to refer on-study patients to other active centres in the case of difficulties in continuing the planned treatment due to COVID-19-related reorganisation.

  • Smart working for data managers and study coordinators.

  • Possible treatment delays or problems in drug supply for logistic reasons around COVID-19.

  • Need for telephone contact report to replace in-person follow-up visits to be included within the patient’s clinical notes.

  • Cancel or delay onsite monitoring visits.

  • Preserve both scientific validity of results and safety of patients and trial staff by implementing decision sharing and strict contacts with the sponsors.

  • *This decision should be based on multiple aspects: the structure and organisation of the oncology centre and the consequent ability to ensure extra procedures (ie, independent cancer centre or oncology department integrated within a general hospital), the type of study and the burden of extra procedures required, ethical considerations related to trial design (ie, presence of a placebo arm), the expected benefit that the patient could derive from the participation into the trial.

Despite all these challenges associated with the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy, we as professionals who take care of a frequently frail patient population in a delicate phase of their life should make all the possible efforts to mitigate the risk of suboptimal management of patients with cancer including those with concurrent COVID-19 infection. Considering the added extra burden of the epidemic for our patients and for all healthcare providers, also including the hard consequences of social distancing and isolation as well as a restriction in family interactions, the provision of encouragement and emotional help is essential. Our generation is facing such a tremendous crisis for the first time, but our commitment and extra energy as young oncologists are crucial to fight and succeed in this difficult situation which calls for the continuation of the provision of compassionate and safe care for our patients with cancer.

Our young oncologists’ perspective (YOP) on protection against COVID-19 can be summarised by making the same acronym Y-O-P.


  • Yourself, and your family: at work, with constant focus and attention on PPE, and in personal life, by following all the official instructions and respecting lifestyle restrictions.

  • Oncological care of our patients, delaying what can be delayed, but trying as much as possible to minimise the impact of the emergency on the usual standard of care.

  • Patients’ themselves from being infected, making any possible effort to minimise the risks and giving continuous direction and appropriate official information.


View Abstract


  • Twitter @matteolambe

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Disclaimer Matteo Lambertini acted as consultant for Roche and Lilly, and received speaker honoraria from Roche, Takeda and Theramex outside the submitted work. Angela Toss acted as consultant for Eisai, Roche and Lilly outside the submitted work. Antonio Passaro acted as consultant for AstraZeneca, Agilent/Dako, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. Carmen Criscitiello received speakers’ bureau and had consultancy/advisory role from Lilly, Roche Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Chiara Cremolini acted as consultant for Roche, Bayer and Amgen, and received personal fees from Roche, Amgen, Bayer, Servier, and research funding from Merck Serono. Icro Meattini acted as consultant for Roche, Novartis, and Lilly outside the submitted work. Maria Vittoria Dieci acted as consultant for Eli Lilly, Genomic Health and Celgene outside the submitted work. Raffaele Giusti acted as consultant and received speaker honoraria for Roche and Astra Zeneca outside the submitted work. Massimo Di Maio acted as consultant for Eisai, Takeda, Janssen, Astellas, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conflicts of interests.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.